Popular ArticlesRecent CommentsTop Moneymakers
  • Bradd: i like to read and explore this kind of site.
  • Comcast Sucks: Joey, Comcast exists because it has no one (or very few) able to challenge its monopoly status....

Link Development and Google’s Link Selling Penalty

I have been doing alot of thinking about linking strategies lately, considering the Google PR bomb a month ago.

I am trying to figure out a few things. First, what is it that triggers the pagerank penalty for selling links? And second, what is a safe method of link building from here forward.

I have been looking at a number of sites trying to develop a theory regarding linking. Google has said Dont Sell Links. The first problem with this is that I have seen a number of sites that dont sell links penalized. A good example of this is vBulletin.com. vBulletin does not sell links, period. Neither does vBulletin.org. However, both took a PR hit. vBulletin.com has been a PR 7 for as long as I can remember and now is a PR 6, and vB.org has been a PR 6 and was reduced to a PR 5.

However, vBadvanced.com also was a PR 7, and managed to keep it’s pagerank level.

Why?

It’s a mystery to me.

vBulletin.com does have a scrolling bar on the left where they feature forums owned by it’s customers. You cannot buy your way into this list, they have to select you. They generally list you if they consider you to be a good customer with a solid and popular forum. But they also keep this list short. (I have 2 of my forums listed in that list, vBulletin-faq.com and lincolnvscadillac.com) They title this list "Featured Forums".

vBadvanced.com has a similar sidebar list where only a handful of forums are listed (vBulletin-faq.com is also listed from there) - This list is simply of other related sites of interest, which they label "Links of Interest".

vBulletin.org ONLY links to a few other official vBulletin sites. No other external links at all.

There is one other factor to consider. The PR of incoming links. When Google implemented this penalty many sites took a pagerank loss. Some more then others. But regardless, their PR strength was reduced and the sites they link to naturally took reductions in PR strength.

Now, lets turn to statscounter.com. This site was a PR 9 before the penalty. They sold a handful of links on their homepage. They reduced to a PR 6 when the penalty was implemented. They placed nofollow tags on their outgoing  links and almost immediately received a PR 10.

SO, this is a real puzzle. I am having a hard time figuring out this one. What concerns me most isnt the ability to sell links. It’s the ability to effectively obtain links to my sites.

More to come…   Please leave comments about your thoughts and theories.

 

2 Responses to “Link Development and Google’s Link Selling Penalty”

  1. » Comment by Tj @ BareFly.com

    It’s been a wonder who google is angry with but whatever google is doing isn’t indeed the right thing. We should ban pagerank just so google knows how does it feel.

  2. » Comment by Dave A

    In property there are only three things that count…

    Location,
    Location and

    …Location.

    In similare vein, perhaps there are only three things that count in links nowadays…

    Relevance,
    Relevance and

    …Well maybe the Pagerank of the page still counts for something ;)

    There is a certain irony that with the diversity of outgoing links inherent in a forum site, many forum sites have been pretty hard hit. In the quest to filter out scam and spam sites, part of the solution would seem to have been a pile of human editors (forum webmasters) on your side. I would have thought this would have made forums more valuable to Google.

    Oh well. Off to change my nofollow settings I go.

Let us know what you think, leave a comment





Close
E-mail It